No hay artículos en el carro
No hay artículos en el carro
RF Explorer WSUB1G+ es un potente analizador de espectro digital de alto rendimiento que cubre el rango de frecuencia de 1 GHz a partir de 50 KHz.
Es una solución muy asequible que reemplaza el modelo base WSUB1G con características adicionales, capacidades y cobertura de frecuencia.
Tamaño de bolsillo y peso ligero.
Caja de metal de aluminio sólido.
Tamaño de bolsillo y peso ligero.
Modo de analizador de espectro con los modos máximo máximo máximo y retención, normal, sobrescritura y promedio
Bibliotecas API y software multiplataforma de Windows/Linux/MacOS
Se puede ampliar con módulos de expansión internos para una banda adicional y funcionalidad.
Para cualquier soporte técnico o sugerencia, por favor visite el sitio web oficial
descargar la última versión de firmwave: https://github.com/SeeedDocument/Bazaar_doc/raw/master/114991051/Firmware%20Spectrum%20Analyzer%20PLUS%20v3_05.exe
Para más detalles, haga clic aquí: http://j3.rf-explorer.com/62-rfe/troubleshooting/200-rf-explorer-wsub1g-plus-battery-up-to-65-only
Backman
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 9 de marzo de 2020
With the help of this analyzer I was able to locate and fix a rather unusual splitter problem that was missing the high end; starting in about the middle of the band. Not obvious on a digital cable system. Easy to use, I anticipate using this for much more than a cable fault locator.
jimeb
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 25 de julio de 2019
the windows software is easy to install. it does work. the spectrum analyzer is not perfect. the price is very attractive. a good value for the $$$.
Douglas Millar
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 23 de mayo de 2019
I have several different RF Explorers. This one works just as nicely as the others. The lower frequency coverage is excellent with good sensitivity and ability to find signals. Free software makes it even better.
MrHosen
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 17 de febrero de 2019
The following problems add up to make RF Explorer into "a chore to use" when you do not have it connected to a computer with analysis software...**** Problem #1: ****Bug: Switch bounce.When manually selecting a frequency via cursor position, the frequency decrease button (left arrow) often jumps by 2 or more cursor points instead of 1. Seems like a poor design or poor hardware quality regarding the "switch bounce prevention" circuit/DSP.**** Problem #2: ****Poor Design: Frequency steps.The manually-selectable cursor point on the RTA display has 111 horizontal positions instead of 101. 110 steps (i.e. 110+1) is not a user-friendly count if a user wishes to match up the cursor points with a known frequency interval between cursor steps. The +1 is to account for the start of the range, such as on a 1-dimensional line graph.For example, you cannot inspect from 500 MHz to 600 MHz in 1 MHz steps because that would necessitate 101 horizontal cursor points. Instead, you must account for 111 horizontal cursor points and choose ~495 to ~605 MHz.**** Problem #3: ****Erroneous Design: Frequency steps.If your goal is to view frequencies in nice increments where a desired center frequency is actually selectable, then you must choose a frequency span/range that would technically cover 112 points (111 steps), even though the display has 111 cursor points (110 steps). Additionally, the start (i.e. lowest) frequency on the graph is not selectable at all via cursor. These issues appear to be due to a surprisingly elementary mathematical error in the design of RF Explorer.Workaround for Problems #2 & #3:Let......Fc-0 = desired center frequency....Fc-x = the setting you actually enter into RF Explorer as the center frequency....Fr-0 = desired span (range) of frequencies to view....Fr-x = the setting you actually enter into RF Explorer as the span (range) of frequencies....Fs = desired jump per frequency step.{Fr-0} = Fs * 110{Fr-x} = {Fr-0} * 111 / 110{Fc-x} = {Fc-0} + {Fr-x} / 111 / 2**** SEEEDS: Feature Requests ****1) Please fix the number disagreement between the range of frequencies (span) and the number of horizontal cursor steps. These *must* be identical. Currently, the span setting is exactly 111/110 too large. The problem may be that the start frequency is too low. In other words, you counted wrong.2) The number of horizontal cursor slots should be a more user-friendly count, such as 101 (i.e. 100+1).3) The center frequency is more important than the extremities and therefore *must* be selectable via cursor.4) The start frequency is a valid point that *should* be selectable via cursor. ...but this should be fixed in context of performing feature request #1 above.
JAG
Comentado en los Estados Unidos el 17 de mayo de 2018
Worked, but would not charge battery beyond 63%. Emailed tech support but never got an answer. Well, here is your review, muffin heads.
Productos recomendados
Mex $8,689.86
Mex $ 1,881 .00 Mex $1,881.00